Where the Truth Lies on Global Warming by Orrette J. Baker

Global warming is a small increase in atmospheric temperature, of the order of 1 degree Fahrenheit per century. Because it is so small compared with the large daily and seasonal temperature changes, some writers have challenged its authenticity. Most agree, however, that the last decade of the twentieth century was the hottest on record, and all the global ice caps are melting. Therefore we can assume that global warming is real, and move on to questions about its causes, its impacts and what we can do about it.

Some of the most popular questions include:

  1. How do we know global warming is really happening?
  2. How do we know what the causes of global warming are?
  3. What are the potential impacts of global warming, and which of them are likely to affect us?

The first question is already answered by means of the evidence that the global temperature is rising although some might argue about the methodology in obtaining the global average temperature.  One student I recall asked me if they had a thermometer in every square mile of the earth. Obviously we do not have that, but the folks at National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) do a great job of monitoring the earth’s temperature.  Check out the NOAA National Climatic Data Center for more details on how it’s done.  We may also examine some of the effects that are attributable to global warming. These include the melting of the polar ice caps, recent super-storms Sandy and earlier Katrina.  This leads us into the second question: what are the causes of global warming?

There are two rival theories on the causes of global warming. The first is the greenhouse effect, while the second is natural cycles.  The former simply makes the case for greenhouse gases trapping heat on the earth’s surface by allowing solar radiation in while absorbing the radiation as it goes back out.

Greenhouse gases:

  • Carbon dioxide- CO2
  • Water vapor -H2O,
  • Methane -CH4, a major component of natural gas and also of flatulent emissions from animals
  • Nitrous oxide -N2O also called laughing gas (no joke)
  • Chlorofluorocarbons – CFCs used in refrigerants and aerosol propellants

The greenhouse effect has always been present and is critical to our global temperature regulation but it is thought that an imbalance in the major greenhouse gas Carbon dioxide- CO is offsetting this balance. Steady increases in CO2 concentrations over the last century have resulted in a small enhancement of the effect. Other greenhouse gases also show significant increases, but the main contributor is CO2, associated with the burning of fossil fuels. Evidence from the ice cores show an increase in average CO2  concentrations from the last 1,000 year levels. 

The other rival theory is natural cycles and is based on the idea that global warming is a natural phenomenon that has little to do with human activities. The Milankovitch explanation remains the most plausible and suggest that there are resonance in the sun-earth coupling. For a deeper yet simplified explanation read the Milankovitch Cycle. The premise from this theory is that global warming is due to the fact we are still emerging from the last ice age, which took place about 20,000 years ago. There is reliable evidence to support large sea level fluctuation, up to 300 m above and 200 m below current levels.  Assuming this was the case then global warming is a natural phenomenon that has nothing to do with burning fossil fuels.

Irrespective of the theories trying to link the causes, we still have to deal with the effects and this brings us to the third question: What are the potential impacts of global warming, and which of them are likely to affect us?

FDR Drive is underwater

The FDR Drive, flooded by Hurricane Sandy the evening of October 29, 2012 : Buzzfeed

The evidence is quite remarkable as the impacts become more apparent: Rise in sea levels due to (a) melting of polar ice caps, and (b) thermal expansion of the sea, flooding of low-lying territories, affecting corals, increased desertification, changing of weather patterns, perhaps even the frequency and intensity of hurricanes (Katrina, Sandy). At the planetary level we may be triggering a runaway increase in CO2,leading to the end of life on the planet. Note that our planetary neighbors, Mars and Venus, both have atmospheres with more than 80% carbon dioxide. Is this the end result of global warming?

Well, as the old adage says, better safe than sorry. Which theory do you suggest is more accurate and what mitigation strategies are more appropriate for it?

 

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Where the Truth Lies on Global Warming by Orrette J. Baker

    1. Interesting take Nick. Fabulous cartoons. I thought we paid millions each year for government advisers or quote on quote experts. Are you suggesting that this is just cosmetic? Also, what is your assessment of people’s willingness to give up some of the comfort we now enjoy to possibly extend the planets life?

  1. We’ll bite. Our view is that an overpopulated human species has put the earth out of balance. While we don’t discount natural causes for some of Earth’s changes, it is not plausible to us that human activity isn’t having a significant negative impact. The most appropriate strategy is to begin to recognize that this planet cannot support billions of people.

      1. Persistent, steady modeling and education. This is a slow approach, but it’s the only approach we can envision that is ethically sound while potentially having an impact. At present, talking openly about overpopulation is downright taboo in some quarters. For example, we don’t know where National Geographic stands on this issue at this moment, but only a short time ago they were clearly reluctant to touch the issue of overpopultion in any way that would link it with the root causes of the challenges we face. Many religions still advocate for increased fertility rates, as do many governments and big businesses. On an interpersonal level, people still routinely encourage young couples to “start having kids” and question them when they don’t have children or stop at one or two.
        Good people with an understanding of this issue have got to start pushing back – have got to find the courage to engage in an open dialog about why it is ethical to limit one’s own fertility and about how billions and billions of people are negatively impacting life on Earth. And we need organizations like National Geographic to find the courage to risk a few magazine sales and help with this education. Silence on this issue is smothering this planet. Barbra & Jack Donachy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s